Moderators: The Mod Squad, The Justice League, M&M Line Developer





Arcane Guyver wrote:Strange how much hate Superman Returns gets these days; I recall people generally liking it when it came out. (76% on Rotten Tomatoes, compared to the 10% Catwoman somehow managed.)

Dragonblade wrote:Arcane Guyver wrote:Strange how much hate Superman Returns gets these days; I recall people generally liking it when it came out. (76% on Rotten Tomatoes, compared to the 10% Catwoman somehow managed.)
That 10% for Catwoman is amazing. That literally means that 1 in 10 critics actually liked it. It blows my mind that anyone liked that movie let alone actual movie critics.


tomorrow wrote:Umm... I kind of disagree with the comment that Whedon has issues with doing villains. Some of the best and most memorable characters he's written thus far have been his bad guys.

roguescribner wrote:I'm sorry, but I have to take issue with Superman Returns being described as "universally panned." That isn't even close to being the truth.
It received overall favorable reviews from critics and generally mixed from audiences. Some people really liked the movie (like moi) while others didn't. But it's not like the movie was up for Razzies or anything.
Now Catwoman was a universally panned movie.

JetstreamGW wrote:Dragonblade wrote:Arcane Guyver wrote:Strange how much hate Superman Returns gets these days; I recall people generally liking it when it came out. (76% on Rotten Tomatoes, compared to the 10% Catwoman somehow managed.)
That 10% for Catwoman is amazing. That literally means that 1 in 10 critics actually liked it. It blows my mind that anyone liked that movie let alone actual movie critics.
if you flip through the 16 "Fresh" reviews, most of them are critics who like crappy movies for their crappiness.



Goldar wrote:Wished they would have set the scenario for a #2, though.


Jameson wrote:Goldar wrote:Wished they would have set the scenario for a #2, though.
But they totally did ...


Kit wrote:Jameson wrote:Goldar wrote:Wished they would have set the scenario for a #2, though.
But they totally did ...
I think using that villain in the second film would be a dire mistake. One critique of this film is that its an alien invasion. Using that villain likely leads to another alien invasion. and, lets face it, what villain do they have that can top the one in the stinger? Save him for film three.

Kit wrote:Jameson wrote:Goldar wrote:Wished they would have set the scenario for a #2, though.
But they totally did ...
I think using that villain in the second film would be a dire mistake. One critique of this film is that its an alien invasion. Using that villain likely leads to another alien invasion. and, lets face it, what villain do they have that can top the one in the stinger? Save him for film three.

JetstreamGW wrote:Doesn't have to be an invasion. It could just be HIM by himself
Also I would argue that Ultron would be a way to up the ante for a third film

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest