Mutants & Masterminds
HQ    ABOUT M&M    SUPER-VISION    GIMMICK'S GADGETS    M&M SUPERLINK    ATOMIC THINK TANK    M&M SHOP
Saving the world, one d20 roll at a time

Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Discuss anything vaguely M&M related here, such as comics, movies, and action figures.

Moderators: The Mod Squad, The Justice League, M&M Line Developer

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby Bladewind » Sun May 06, 2012 6:47 pm

Once again, I must say, good points.

I was wordy in getting at the fact that I went to see a bunch of costumes and have a good time doing it.

I succeeded on both counts.

If folks didn't like it... that's their prerogative. And that's not to say that the film didn't have it's eye rolling moments. I just happen to like it.
User avatar
Bladewind
Paragon
Paragon
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:20 am
Location: Laval

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby roguescribner » Sun May 06, 2012 7:09 pm

I'm sorry, but I have to take issue with Superman Returns being described as "universally panned." That isn't even close to being the truth.

It received overall favorable reviews from critics and generally mixed from audiences. Some people really liked the movie (like moi) while others didn't. But it's not like the movie was up for Razzies or anything.

Now Catwoman was a universally panned movie. :wink:
GM - Age of Heroes
Co-GM - The League of Extraordinary Persons
Blackstone - Guild of the Bat
Lardo - Wild Cards: Aces & 8s
User avatar
roguescribner
Luminary
Luminary
 
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:10 am

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby Arcane Guyver » Sun May 06, 2012 8:37 pm

Strange how much hate Superman Returns gets these days; I recall people generally liking it when it came out. (76% on Rotten Tomatoes, compared to the 10% Catwoman somehow managed.)
www.fistfullofcomics.com

Don't beg for things; do it yourself, or you won't get anything.
User avatar
Arcane Guyver
Partisan
Partisan
 
Posts: 627
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:32 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby Dragonblade » Sun May 06, 2012 9:59 pm

Arcane Guyver wrote:Strange how much hate Superman Returns gets these days; I recall people generally liking it when it came out. (76% on Rotten Tomatoes, compared to the 10% Catwoman somehow managed.)


That 10% for Catwoman is amazing. That literally means that 1 in 10 critics actually liked it. It blows my mind that anyone liked that movie let alone actual movie critics.
Dragonblade
Comrade
Comrade
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 7:23 pm

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby JetstreamGW » Sun May 06, 2012 10:03 pm

Dragonblade wrote:
Arcane Guyver wrote:Strange how much hate Superman Returns gets these days; I recall people generally liking it when it came out. (76% on Rotten Tomatoes, compared to the 10% Catwoman somehow managed.)


That 10% for Catwoman is amazing. That literally means that 1 in 10 critics actually liked it. It blows my mind that anyone liked that movie let alone actual movie critics.


if you flip through the 16 "Fresh" reviews, most of them are critics who like crappy movies for their crappiness.
JetstreamGW
Disciple
Disciple
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 3:38 pm

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby tomorrow » Mon May 07, 2012 4:01 am

Umm... I kind of disagree with the comment that Whedon has issues with doing villains. Some of the best and most memorable characters he's written thus far have been his bad guys.
User avatar
tomorrow
Mastermind
Mastermind
 
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 4:14 pm

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby IronSledge » Mon May 07, 2012 5:10 am

tomorrow wrote:Umm... I kind of disagree with the comment that Whedon has issues with doing villains. Some of the best and most memorable characters he's written thus far have been his bad guys.


I liked Spike and all, but when you get down to brass tacks, he just wasn't very good at his job. I think he's probably the best of Whedon's villains, and had his heyday almost a decade and a half ago.

I would like to talk about this further, though. Would you mind if we split this off into its own thread?
My blog: Family stuff, Zelazny book reviews and M&M campaign logs!
IronSledge
Hireling
Hireling
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:52 am

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby IronSledge » Mon May 07, 2012 7:05 am

roguescribner wrote:I'm sorry, but I have to take issue with Superman Returns being described as "universally panned." That isn't even close to being the truth.

It received overall favorable reviews from critics and generally mixed from audiences. Some people really liked the movie (like moi) while others didn't. But it's not like the movie was up for Razzies or anything.

Now Catwoman was a universally panned movie. :wink:


I liked Superman Returns well enough, but I don't think it was the best Superman movie it could have been.
My blog: Family stuff, Zelazny book reviews and M&M campaign logs!
IronSledge
Hireling
Hireling
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:52 am

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby Mr Mole » Mon May 07, 2012 7:07 am

JetstreamGW wrote:
Dragonblade wrote:
Arcane Guyver wrote:Strange how much hate Superman Returns gets these days; I recall people generally liking it when it came out. (76% on Rotten Tomatoes, compared to the 10% Catwoman somehow managed.)

That 10% for Catwoman is amazing. That literally means that 1 in 10 critics actually liked it. It blows my mind that anyone liked that movie let alone actual movie critics.

if you flip through the 16 "Fresh" reviews, most of them are critics who like crappy movies for their crappiness.

Maybe that can be what brings us all together as a team... United in the common conviction that Avengers was better than Catwoman... :mrgreen:
User avatar
Mr Mole
Champion
Champion
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:33 am
Location: Washington (the state, not the district)

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby Goldar » Tue May 08, 2012 1:46 pm

Just got back from seeing The Avengers, and I really, really liked it! A+ for action, adventure and sci-fi tech! I liked that it was longer than most movies and it covered a lot of ground, like almost from where the individual movies left off. Wished they would have set the scenario for a #2, though. :(

The only thing I really didn't like was that 'Tasha didn't use her Widow's line to swing or grab Loki's sceptre. And her Widow's Bites, er, really bit, :roll: because they were not only hard to see when powered up, but she barely used them, they seemed to need to touch someone in order to be used instead of firing a powerful electric jolt and they were hardly visible against the dark black of her costume. But, at least we got lots of BW fighting, flipping and gun-slinging! :)
User avatar
Goldar
Partisan
Partisan
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:58 am

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby Jameson » Tue May 08, 2012 1:53 pm

Goldar wrote:Wished they would have set the scenario for a #2, though.


But they totally did ...
Forty six and two are just ahead of me.

Read my M&M product reviews here
User avatar
Jameson
Luminary
Luminary
 
Posts: 2519
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:48 am
Location: an hour west of Beantown

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby Kit » Tue May 08, 2012 2:04 pm

Jameson wrote:
Goldar wrote:Wished they would have set the scenario for a #2, though.


But they totally did ...


I think using that villain in the second film would be a dire mistake. One critique of this film is that its an alien invasion. Using that villain likely leads to another alien invasion. and, lets face it, what villain do they have that can top the one in the stinger? Save him for film three.
You must be proud, bold, pleasant, resolute,
And now and then stab, as occasion serves.

--Christopher Marlowe, Edward II, Act II, Scene I
User avatar
Kit
Mod Squad
Mod Squad
 
Posts: 25272
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 1:59 pm
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby Mr Mole » Tue May 08, 2012 2:49 pm

Kit wrote:
Jameson wrote:
Goldar wrote:Wished they would have set the scenario for a #2, though.

But they totally did ...

I think using that villain in the second film would be a dire mistake. One critique of this film is that its an alien invasion. Using that villain likely leads to another alien invasion. and, lets face it, what villain do they have that can top the one in the stinger? Save him for film three.

I tend to agree with you on that point.
User avatar
Mr Mole
Champion
Champion
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:33 am
Location: Washington (the state, not the district)

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby JetstreamGW » Tue May 08, 2012 3:38 pm

Kit wrote:
Jameson wrote:
Goldar wrote:Wished they would have set the scenario for a #2, though.


But they totally did ...


I think using that villain in the second film would be a dire mistake. One critique of this film is that its an alien invasion. Using that villain likely leads to another alien invasion. and, lets face it, what villain do they have that can top the one in the stinger? Save him for film three.


Doesn't have to be an invasion. It could just be HIM by himself ;)

Also I would argue that Ultron would be a way to up the ante for a third film :D
JetstreamGW
Disciple
Disciple
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 3:38 pm

Re: Avengers film [May 4, 2012]

Postby Beleriphon » Tue May 08, 2012 6:34 pm

JetstreamGW wrote:Doesn't have to be an invasion. It could just be HIM by himself ;)

Also I would argue that Ultron would be a way to up the ante for a third film :D


Ultron, yes. Stinger villain, I can only hope. The signature item of one of his major story lines has already been seen in a previous movie. I expect Thor 2 to get that item involved.
User avatar
Beleriphon
Luminary
Luminary
 
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: Peterborough, ON... of Evil!

PreviousNext

Return to Sidekicks Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests